1. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината
2. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината. Kak ce съсипва икономиката.
3. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината. Никола Жеков. Българското войнство 1878-1928
4. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината. Из речта на др. Вълко Червенков
5. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината. Окупацията.
6. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината. СЪВЕТСКАТА ОКУПАЦИЯ ПРЕЗ 1944-47г.
7. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината. Как руският цар върна „освободената” България обратно в рамките на Османската империя
8. Русия ( Россия ) - враг №1 на българщината. 1884 - Русия срещу Съединението
1884. Русия срещу Съединението.
(Автоматичен превод от френски)
Russia freed Bulgaria at the price from immense sacrifices inmen and silver. Can it suffer that this young country, of which it intended to make the avant-garde of its walk ahead towards the Mediterranean, escape its influence completely and becomes the ally of its rival Austria-Hungary? The moment is decisive. Two possibilities present: or Bulgaria constitutes itself apart from the influence Russian, and in spite of Russia, and later under the auspices of Hungary is formed a Balkan federation, that Romania defends in the camp cut off created in this moment with Bucharest, or Bulgaria becomes vassal and the advanced station of the Muscovite empire. In the first case, Constantinople and the banks of the sea Égée definitively escape Russia and it are not any more but in the unlimited plains of Asia that it can extend. In the second case, Russianized Bulgaria and one day increased involves Serbia, takes with reverse Bosnia and, of Philippopoli, dominates the Bosphorus; occupation of Constantinople by one army bulgaro-Russian is early or late inevitable. Twice already, Russian armies arrived almost for the Horn-D' But, andhowever their base of operation was then the Ukraine and they had to advance, of stage in stage, by crossing Moldavie, the Danube and Balkans. On the basis of Roumélie, they would arrive in some days with the Marmara Sea and the Bosphorus. One would not have a long time so that the Peninsula, Slavic of race and orthodoxe of religion, became, like Finland, a dependence of the great empire of North. Greece could it then preserve its independence? And which would be the fate reserved in Austria-Hungary, of which Slavic populations, more many that all the others joined together, would resist with difficulty the almost irresistible attraction which the principle exerts today of nationalities?.............
At once the opposition between England and Russia appeared. Making both completion volte-face, the first approved the union, that it had fought so much in Berlin, and the second attacked it, then that it had failed to risk the war to maintain it five years previously...............
While Austria and England, entirely of agreement, and evenGermany and Italy, accepted like inevitable the union of bothBulgaries and that the Door was resigned to it, Russia fought it with eagerness, contrary to the feelings of the Russian nation, because us let us see in the _Blue English Book_ (_B. B. _, I, n° 161) that them Russian officers with Philippopoli applauded the revolution of the 18 September, until the moment when instructions in contrary direction them arrived................
In the meeting of the conference of November 25, the ambassador of Russia, Mr. de Nélidoff, asked that the base of all the deliberations was “it re-establishment of the order, in conformity with the stipulations of the treaty from Berlin”, which implied an absolute veto with the union of bothBulgaries..............
A few days later, the consul of Russia with Philippopoli threatened them notable rouméliotes of the intervention of the Turkish troops, if they did not agree immediately at the requests of the Door. The notable ones answered proudly that they would push back the Turks and that they had on the border an army of 70,000 men lends to fight whoever their border would pass. (_B. B. _, II, n° 57.)...........Why Russia persisted in it defending only the treaty of Berlin,that it had cursed so much, and to fight the realization of the goalthe main thing of its treaty of San-Stéfano?................
The true reason for the opposition of the czar to the union of both Bulgaries seem to be this one. Russia, by freeing Bulgaria at the price of a very expensive war and very loophole, had hoped that this province, Russianized soon, would have remained entirely under its dependence, like Bosnia under that of Austria. Troops Bulgarian, exerted and ordered by Russian officers, had to form its own army one or two corps. The assimilation seemed all the more easy, that the Bulgarian language is of all the dialects Slavic that which approaches more of Russian, and that clergy and them peasant-which constitute almost all population-were it entirely devoted “to the Czar liberator”........
But Russia showed itself very clumsy. It treated the Bulgarian ones and their prince in moudjiks. It thus caused a resistance which went growing and which was to strengthen the revolution of September 18, made by the democratic party. It feared that Bulgaria, unified without its support and without its knowledge, did not become a State containing all the elementsof a free and autonomous development, which, like Romania, would hear to defend its independence and would like at no price to become the vassal one despot isme moscovite...................
It was convinced that its interest ordered to him to be opposed, by all the means, with the unification of nationality Bulgarian; not understanding that it fought against a movement irresistible and that it sacrificed thus among her brothers of the South its popularity so dearly acquired. ................
On several occasions, it had been believed that a conflict was inevitable. Kaulbars general had announced that if the Bulgarian ones were not subjected not to its wills, the Cossacks would come to put them at the reason. Russian drain-holes crossed in front of Bourgas and Varna, and of the troops Russian massed on the edges of the Black Sea. But the count Kálnoky in Vienna and the Tisza minister in Pesth made hear, within their Parliament, a language if Net and if edge that one had to believe that it would not be repudiated by Germany. ....................
Russia, indicator to draw up in front of it a coalition of all them powers, excluded France, believed careful not to send in Bulgaria Cossacks announced by the Kaulbars general. It thus had fact a deplorable campaign; because, in addition to the nuisance of a retirement late and awkward, it had alienated sympathies of populations which owed him their independence. Lessons of the history profit little, because Russia had previously made the same fault in Serbia. After having obtained for the Serb ones, in 1820, an independence almost supplements, it maintained in the country a permanent agitation, in order to force it to throw itself in its arms. Through gold, it caused a series of conspiracies and rebellions and it forced successively Milosch, prince Michel and Alexandre Kara-George to be abdicated and with to take refuge in Austria. Tired these intrigues, the Serb ones finished by to withdraw itself completely from the influence of Russia, and though recently it is with the Russian victories that Serbia owes its last enlargings, it is not in Saint-Pétersbourg only Belgrade requires its inspirations.............
Russia wants it to make of Bulgaria a vassal province, then it to reign one of its creatures is necessary to send to it, pressed on regiments Muscovites. If the prince enjoys a certain independence and if it is not supported that by Bulgarian troops, it will have to act in the interest of country, or it will be reversed by its subjects. If it must, on the contrary, obey with the instructions of the czar, the practice of the constitutional mode will be impossible. Even with the help of the coup d'etat, prince de Battenberg could not continue to control in opposition with the feelings and them wishes of the country. What wants Russia can be obtained only by one permanent occupation.............
LA PÉNINSULE DES BALKANSVIENNE, CROATIE, BOSNIE, SERBIE, BULGARIEROUMÉLIE, TURQUIE, ROUMANIETOME IPARISFÉLIX ALCAN, ÉDITEURSUCCESSEUR DE GERMER-BAILLIÈRE ET Cie108, BOULEVARD SAINT-GERMAIN, 1081888BRUXELLES P. WEISSENBRUCH, IMP. DU ROI 45, RUE DU POINÇONLA PÉNINSULE DES BALKANS LIBRAIRIE C. MUQUARDT0
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар